hooglvip.blogg.se - The evolution of robin thicke zip download

#The evolution of robin thicke zip download for mac
#The evolution of robin thicke zip download pro
#The evolution of robin thicke zip download license

Monolithic Imaging, snapshot repackaging and other methods to manually copy files around outside the developers’ installer tool can lead to more problems down the line.

With the above comment from Paul (from the #microsoft-office channel, at 7.25PM GMT on 1st December 2015) it was confirmed that the fact this worked was indeed a bug and it would be ‘fixed’ in an upcoming release.įor the Mac administrator, this meant that if you’d previously been copying the file around and / or used a snapshot packaging method to capture the file, it will stop working with a future update.

#The evolution of robin thicke zip download for mac

With the release of Office for Mac 2016, this same trick also appeared to work.

#The evolution of robin thicke zip download license

Repackaged the Office for Mac 2011 suite with the license file (e.g.Used monolithic imaging to image your Macs.This specifically would be the situation if you: This has come from a discussion where the previous version of Office for Mac (‘Office for Mac 2011’) allowed the use of the same licensing.

#The evolution of robin thicke zip download pro

This includes Microsoft Office, Sibelius, Pro Tools and many, many more.Ī few examples of what I’m talking about regarding the comments from developers: Microsoft Office 2016 and the license fileĪs specified by Paul Bowden – Software Engineer for Office for Mac/iOS at Microsoft) on the Mac Admins Slack:.Some institutes / companies require that initial ‘first run’ screens are suppressed.This could include licensing, and initial user pre-configuration.Some applications will need additional configuration post-install.(these can be deployed but some deployment solutions will require them to be wrapped in a package).Including Firey Printer Drivers, Sophos (see below) and NetSupport Assist (also below).app installers, or installers that need user interaction during the installation Some vendor-supplied installers aren’t deployable in enterprise solutions.There are a number of reasons that a Mac Admin may feel the need to repackage software to deploy.

Why do admins repackage vendor-supplied installers? Why bother spending time doing it at all? I am by no means an expert in this area, but after keeping an eye on areas such as Slack, Munki-Dev / Munki-Discuss, JAMFNation, Mac Enterprise, conference videos and the like, I’ve developed my own set of rules I try to follow. Since getting involved with Mac Administration and consultancy, I’ve observed and assisted others with converting applications from what a vendor supplies, to something that is mass-deployable, and suitable for enterprise usage.ĭuring this time, I’ve seen increased usage of snapshot packaging as a first choice.Īdditionally, I’ve also seen increasing comments from vendors that if their applications or installers are repackaged, then any issues raised will be unsupported (e.g. This blog is a little bit different… and a little bit the same.